Recently I tried to create a Unit test for a Drupal service that creates and returns entities. In my test I wanted to check if the field values that were used for creating those entities were matching my assertions.
In Drupal , the static ::create
method of any content entity returns the created entity. In my unit test, checking the returned entity for values would be a hassle, as I would have to mock and stub my way through all the services that it relies on to fetch those values. More useful would be to mock the entity and let the ::create()
method return the values that were just passed as arguments.
¿Does that make any sense?
Let me try and explain:
Say you have a service that creates a bunch of entities, like:
class MyService{
/**
* @return Foo[]
**/
public function createFoos(){
$data = [
'one',
'two',
'three'
];
$foos = [];
foreach($data as $value){
$foos[] = Foo::create([
'custom_field' => $value,
]);
}
return $foos;
}
}
Say you have a test that looks like this:
class MyServiceTest extends UnitTestCase{
/**
* @var \MyService
*/
protected $sut; // Subject under test.
/**
* Setting up the test.
*/
public function setUp(){
$this->sut = new MyService();
}
/**
* Test ::createFoos()
*/
public function testCreateFoos(){
$expected = ['one', 'two', 'tree'];
$result = $this->sut->createFoos();
$this->assertEquals($expected, $result);
}
}
In this case the test would break for two reasons. One, because the Service Container doesn’t exist. OK, I’ll have to do something about that.
Two, because $this->sut->createFoos()
returns Foo[]
, while I’m checking for values of type string[]
. As I said, having to pull the data from my Foo
entities and convert them to string[]
would probably mean a whole lot more of stubbing, mocking, and breakpointing my way through the code. Instead, it would be a lot easier to let Foo::create($values)
just return the $values
I just put in.
Since Foo::create()
is a static method (and testing and static methods don’t go well together), It’s important to realise that Foo::create()
is in fact calling the instance method of the ‘Foo’ Entity Storage, see Entity.php:
public static function create(array $values = []) {
$entity_manager = \Drupal::entityManager();
return $entity_manager->getStorage($entity_manager->getEntityTypeFromClass(get_called_class()))->create($values);
}
So what we want is to let $entity_manager->create($values)
to return the $values
that were just put in as arguments. With Prophesy that’s quite easy to do:
$entity_storage = $this->prophesize(EntityStorageInterface::class);
$entity_storage->create(Argument::any())->will(function($args, $mock){
return $args;
}
After that, the mocked $entity_storage goes into the mocked entity manager, which will go into a brand new Drupal Container.
The complete test would look like this.
class MyServiceTest extends UnitTestCase{
/**
* @var \MyService
*/
protected $sut; // Subject under test.
/**
* Setting up the test.
*/
public function setUp(){
// My subject under test.
$this->sut = new MyService();
// Mocking the services.
$entity_manager = $this->prophesize(EntityManagerInterface::class);
$entity_storage = $this->prophesize(EntityStorageInterface::class);
// Doing some magic.
$entity_storage->create(Argument::any())->will(function($args, $mock){
return $args;
}
$entity_manager->getStorage('foo')->willReturn($entity_storage);
$entity_manager->getEntityTypeFromClass(Foo::class)->willReturn('foo');
// Putting the mocked services in the Drupal service container.
$container = new ContainerBuilder();
$container->set('entity.manager', $entity_manager->reveal());
\Drupal::setContainer($container);
}
/**
* Test ::createFoos()
*/
public function testCreateFoos(){
$expected = ['one', 'two', 'tree'];
$result = $this->sut->createFoos();
$this->assertEquals($expected, $result);
}
}
I hope this makes sense and that it’s helpful for those who are trying to unit test methods that return Drupal entities.
Suggestions are very welcome.
comments powered by Disqus